As to other crewmen, as their sight at things was, naturally, more widely, the unexpectedness has caused in them much more
serious fears. Not that that pilots and geologists have not been prepared for any complications and failures. At all is not
present. Everyone knew, for example, that at speeds of "Hiusa" the landing place could appear on distance of many
thousand kilometres from Golconda; "Hius" could sit down in mountains, turn over, at last break about rocks. But all it were
the provided complications and failures and consequently not terrible even if they threatened with  destruction.
"In the big business always risk, - Krajuhin, - and that who very much is afraid of  destruction, with us not on road" liked to
speak. But a bog on Venus! At all endurance and a wide experience mezhplanetniki only with great difficulty hid the anxiety
which has from each other captured them.
The trade has accustomed them to be constrained in similar cases. And meanwhile each of them understood that the destiny
of expedition and their life depend now on variety unknown while circumstances. In consciousness of everyone promptly,
one after another, there were new and new questions. Whether the bog far lasts? What it itself represents? Whether there
will pass on it "Boy"? Whether threatens "Hiusu" danger to plunge even more deeply or to turn over and sink? Whether it is
possible to risk again to lift planetolet and to try to plant it somewhere in other place? Shortly before start of Dauge Krajuhinu
has told: "If only safely to sit down, and there we will pass though through a hell". All of them knew, what, probably, it is
necessary "to pass through a hell" but who could assume, what this hell will be here such - muddy, gurgling, not clear?.
As it has already been told, Bykova, on its lack of information, excited reasons of absolutely other order. For destiny of
expedition he did not worry, for trusted in wonderful possibilities of "Hiusa" and, the main thing, in the companions, especially
in Ermakova in which voice it was not felt also confusion shades. For Bykova the unexpectedness was only an adventure.
And it has been rather flattered, when Ermakov has supported it in small dispute with Jurkovsky at the open hatch.